PDA

View Full Version : Mjolnir vs. Exaliber a comparison of legends



brudswick
06-16-2011, 07:46 PM
I'd like to talk about the simularities and differences between these two legends .

Cartoon Character
06-25-2011, 09:45 PM
Mjolnir is Thor's hammer, so that wins.

S0urceror
06-25-2011, 10:33 PM
Isn't Mjolnir a giant? He was going out of manifestation when some Beowulf guy came and challenged him to quiz-tionary.

Cartoon Character
06-26-2011, 12:15 AM
Yep. I heard that too.

Ragna
07-27-2011, 03:46 PM
Both Mjolnir and Excalibur are magical weapons. Both of them are linked to other worlds. You have to look at both of these legends and find key symbols. Also on the name King Arthur (I read somewhere in a book that the name itself sounds "Ar" "Thur") has a pre-christian connection to earlier myths.

Talsin
07-31-2011, 04:50 AM
There is no story about Excaliburs forging. Whilst there are various versions of the tale regarding how Mjolnir was made.

What kind of value do you hope to gain by comparing the two? Personally I don't see any reason why you would.

Jackal
09-23-2011, 09:56 PM
Well...A gods weapon vs a magic sword...Hmmm

Belasko
09-25-2011, 09:07 PM
this thread sucks dick.

Yugatsu
11-11-2011, 11:45 PM
i dont know wether im mixing up Excalibur and Caliburn but whichever shouldn't you really be comparing them with gamm as thats what the story is bast on. otherwise its like comparing Glipnir and hrunting which is stuped.

daecon
11-12-2011, 02:54 AM
Mjolnir is Thor's hammer, so that wins.

Consider that "god" for the Norse is a relative thing. A god for a pagan culture is different from the JCI God in that it is simultaneously a power and a personality. Thor is both the explanation for lightning strikes and a guy who once had to dress in drag in order to get His hammer back from a giant. It's fair, then, to compare gods, heroes and other mythological figures in spite of their assumed power differences.

That said, there aren't too many obvious similarities other then the general "magic weapon." Mjolnir is the Lightning while Excalibur seems to have no inherent powers at all. (In some versions, though, the scabbard heals wounds.) On the other hand, Mjolnir is specifically stated to be flawed. Its handle is too short to wield as a war club, which is why it must be thrown. It also has a definite origin, forged by the dwarfs. Where the Lady of the Lake managed to get Excalibur is anyone's guess.

Lothfavnir
12-08-2011, 12:34 AM
I think those two weapons are different in many regards. They are different in many regards.

Mjolnir was a weapon of the Gods. Forged by the dwarves who were master-craftsmen. It was a weapon of legends. But, it didn't stop there. At our groves Thor was a popular god. He was both a master of the masculine fertility as well as a master of war. That was a good combination that appealed to many of those who lived along the Northern Path. Thor was by far the most popular God to sacrifice to. The irony is that he was not the most powerful. That would be the King of Kings, The Father of All. But, peasants knew that the power he gave had it's price. And those who walked in Odin's footsteps would be at his mercy when they died. They risked to wander the earth as undead for all eternity. That was a high price to pay. So, Thor was a safe God to worship. He was an aspect that took care of the things that worried people the most, weather and bravery. To this day, the warrior-aspect of the God Thor is still remembered. There are groves where the hammers stood. You could feel Thor's presence at the groves once blood was given to him. You could also contact the Volves which were women trained in the dark arts. They had access to the spirit-world. So, the hammer is a totem. A place where gods reside. The talisman of Odin is still worn around many necks as a token of respect to the old Gods. I must tell that when I am at the grove nearby I can feel eyes watching me, and see the ravens circle. It has been hundreds of years since we fed the Gods, but the ravens of course remember. They are thirsty and want the old Gods to live again. This is how the hammer is still alive in our culture. Recently, metal musicians have started to use the hammer as their symbol. And they go to great lengths to learn the old ways. But, we all know that Mjolnir belongs to the realm of Gods. The symbols we wear are only symbols.

The story of Arthur is about a king of Britain that has a fate connected to the land of Avalon and his country. The physical Avalon was destroyed over a millennium ago during the massacre by the Roman empire. But, it is foretold that in the final battle of Britain Arthur will return from Avalon to fight once more for the country. Then the sword will of course resurface and a hero will wield it. Avalon is today a spiritual place, and you will find only dead people at the island of Angsley in Wales. You will also find Christians that treats this place as their own. Excalibur is a physical weapon that will be wielded in a coming war. It can be that we find the actual sword at Angsley and that leads Britain to a new victory for their very existence in the future. It can also be that the sword has to be reforged. But, nobody wears the Excalibur as a talisman. It is not a talisman or a symbol. It is a weapon for heroes in a time of great distress.