Mind and Reality Mind and Reality
Donate Now Goal amount for this month: 30 USD, Received: 0 USD (0%)

User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Mind and Reality

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    39
    Post Thanks / Like
    Points
    1
    Level
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Points
    0
    Donations
    0 - $0.00

    Default Mind and Reality

    Is there a separation between Mind and Reality?

    Please explain your reply.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    179
    Post Thanks / Like
    Points
    1
    Level
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Points
    0
    Donations
    0 - $0.00

    Default

    There is already, essentially, a thread discussing this. "Solipsism".

    But seeing as solipsism and what you're suggesting aren't necessarily linked, there're a number of ways you could try and tackle the problem.

    I'd go for one influences the other, the mind is clearly part of reality, pretty much by definition. We've little in way of testing whether reality is just part of the mind, so I'd go onto say that this, when phrased literally, has essentially no meaning as a question.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Age
    44
    Posts
    296
    Post Thanks / Like
    Points
    1
    Level
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Points
    0
    Donations
    0 - $0.00

    Default

    in a practical manor, if your can think it you can create it.

    in the realist perspective there is the matter of thought and matter. before materialization there is the idea. the idea of thought as the basis of materialization, thus being a part of reality, but this is suggesting that what we think and sense is real.
    Man is invited to question, discover, explore,
    and manipulate the world around him and use it for his benefit.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Universe A
    Age
    38
    Posts
    280
    Post Thanks / Like
    Points
    1
    Level
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Points
    0
    Donations
    0 - $0.00

    Default

    There is no separation.
    Don't talk to familiars

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Raleigh, NC; from the NYC area
    Age
    44
    Posts
    34
    Post Thanks / Like
    Points
    1
    Level
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Points
    0
    Donations
    0 - $0.00

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Natasha77 View Post
    Is there a separation between Mind and Reality?

    Please explain your reply.

    Thanks.
    Well, obviously, there is a spatial separation between one's body and the physical objects which lie outside of one's direct volitional control. "Mind" as it stands here unqualifiedly--and thus I will assume it is to be taken in its range of "ordinary" usages; i.e. the burden of a focused definition is on whomever who might choose to reply--could be so extended as to entail the entirety of the phenomenal world (a la solipsism), although I do think that we have good reason for regonizing an external world wherein the properties described by the physical sciences are intrinsic and relatively mind-independent, at least on the level the personal mind.

    It seems to me that many of the difficulties, which would even allow the occasion of a question such as yours, stem from the fact that some of those properties that we would desginate as "mental," occupy a sort of quasi-space beginning from our proprioceptive states and extending at least as far as our representational thinking--the meaningful sounds and images "inside of our head." Without wasting our time with semantic legerdemain--just assuming that you have left many of the details of your question open-ended--I would say that the answer to your question would lie in whether or not one woud choose to postulate a macrocosmic mental agency as a causal principle behind external world events. Please note, however, that the relationship between one's own individual consciousness and this macrocosmic mind would not involve that type of disparate distinction which manifests between physical objects, though we must avoid falling into that type of bare, and indistinguishable unity which Hegel characterized as "the night wherein all cows are black"; there would be distinction but perhaps much more appropriately qualified as conceptually distinguishable but implicating a sort of universal entailment--that man whose successors nominated as theiotatos, or "most divine," described such a mutual, eidetic possession of all things in each thing, by his own Greek neologism, allelouchia.
    Last edited by Phnouthis; 12-22-2009 at 04:23 AM.
    "If you, Hegias, are saying that theurgy is divine then I agree with you. But those destined to be gods must first become human; that is why Plato said that philosophy is the greatest gift ever to have come down from the Gods to humanity."

    --Isidore of Gaza, recorded by Damascius the Diadochus in his Philosophical History.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Age
    44
    Posts
    296
    Post Thanks / Like
    Points
    1
    Level
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Points
    0
    Donations
    0 - $0.00

    Default

    truth shall remain true, yet man shall see that truth differently.

    That which is not understood is not necessarily a illness, but perhaps a way of reveling without giving the answer.
    Man is invited to question, discover, explore,
    and manipulate the world around him and use it for his benefit.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fayetteville, NC
    Posts
    167
    Post Thanks / Like
    Points
    1
    Level
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Points
    0
    Donations
    0 - $0.00

    Default

    I really like your first post zero. Thats a good explanation.
    When the listening is good, life is good
    He who listens is the master of what is beneficial
    Listening is beneficial to the listener
    Listening is better than anything else
    That is how perfect love is born.

    -- Ptahhotep

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hypersigil or Writing Stories that Become Reality
    By Lolita in forum Chaos Magic
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-31-2011, 05:47 AM
  2. Reality Manipulation Theory.
    By Windmaster in forum Chaos Magic
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11-25-2009, 04:39 PM
  3. Confusing dreams with reality
    By serpent in forum Dream Interpretation
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-13-2009, 11:13 PM
  4. Illusions of Reality.
    By Saeiane in forum Witchcraft
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-08-2009, 03:25 AM
  5. Creating physical reality
    By saint_john in forum Ceremonial Magic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-10-2009, 10:38 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.